To say I’m not a big football fan is an understatement, so I’m not fussed about the current World Cup proceedings. That might be due in part to low-scoring matches, and the majority of the interest seemingly coming from off-the-pitch antics rather than on-the-pitch artistry.
Perhaps the game would benefit from a bit of a refresh? Some ideas:
- vary the scoring
- award extra points for two goals scored by the same side within 5 minutes?
- award points for non-goals (e.g. fractional points for shots on target and near-goals – not near-misses, since those by definition are goals!)
- use more than one ball – perhaps introduce an extra ball every 5 minutes until one side scores? Possibly change the ball design to make its motion less predictable.
- vary team sizes – perhaps remove one player from each side every 5 minutes until one side scores (perhaps a player voted for in real-time by spectators) or remove one player from the scoring side for every goal scored
- vary the goal post arrangement
- vary the goal size/position during the match
- increase the number of goal posts (perhaps one set on all four sides of the pitch)
No doubt the purists would be up-in-arms at the thought of tinkering with their “beautiful game” and, admittedly, some of the ideas would bring challenges for the players, referees, ground staff and/or spectators. I’m sure with recent advances in technology (e.g. in the television space Hawk-Eye, Interactive TV, IP TV, 3D TV and Virtual Cameras) many of the problems are surmountable. Times change; perhaps football should too?
Update 4/7/2010: Wimbledon-inspired ideas – split the match into several ‘sets’. Winner of a set must be 2 goals clear. Matches could be over in minutes or drag on for hours!
Maybe the players should have their annual earnings displayed on their shirts instead of the existing system of numbers – it might ease the boredom a bit and the spectators could argue about who’s worth what while they wait for goals to be scored.
Maggie